By BEN BOTKIN/Oregon Capital Chronicle
Amid mounting opposition to offshore wind development off the coast of Oregon, the federal government announced Friday it is delaying a planned auction for the development of two wind energy sites as Gov. Tina Kotek urged the federal agency to halt all leasing plans and stop the auction.
The developments call into question the potential for future development of offshore wind energy off the Oregon coast. The state’s coastal communities, seafood industry and tribes fiercely opposed the federal agency’s plans, which concerned the governor.
In a letter on Friday to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Kotek said Oregon had “no choice” but to withdraw from the intergovernmental task force that’s working on offshore energy to protect Oregon’s interests and engage more with the public. Her letter comes amid concerns from coastal communities and tribes about environmental impacts and threats to culturally and economically significant sites that are home to fish and other marine species.
Kotek said the agency’s “accelerated process” was worrisome, with the bureau announcing in late August that it would auction leases in October to developers to start planning facilities. That announcement led to the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians suing the federal bureau, over its environmental assessment which greenlighted the projects. The tribes want the bureau to consider the future impacts of installing wind energy sites offshore.
“I believe that Oregon has no choice but to withdraw from the BOEM Oregon Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Task Force in order to ensure that Oregon’s interests are fully protected, and that we have adequate time to complete our state roadmap with engagement and participation of key constituencies and the public,” Kotek wrote in her letter. “Given this, I request that BOEM halt all current leasing activities off the coast of Oregon and terminate the current auction.”
The two sites would cover 61,200 acres off the coast of Coos Bay and nearly 134,000 acres off the coast of Brookings. The Coos Bay site is 30 miles from the coast and the Brookings area is 20 miles away and they could potentially generate more than 3.1 gigawatts of renewable energy, enough to power 1 million households.
The state’s planned Offshore Wind Roadmap, part of House Bill 4080 which passed this year, is meant to lay the foundation for offshore wind energy development that complies with labor standards and with community input.The bureau had planned to auction the sites on Oct. 15 but said in its announcement that officials decided to postpone the auction after receiving a notice of interest from only one of five qualified companies. Even after any plans are developed they would be required to undergo environment assessments and other reviews before the installations could take place.
Outlook is uncertain
In its statement, the federal agency said it would continue work with state, local and tribal officials on the issue and coordinate potential leases and engagement with communities. The federal agency said the state’s roadmap for offshore wind energy is one way to do that.
But the federal agency didn’t give a timeline for what might happen next or when it might come out with one.
Tribal Council Chair Brad Kneaper of the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians welcomed the cancellation of the auction.
“Canceling the lease sale makes sense,” Kneaper said. “The tribe, elected officials, commercial fishing interests and others have consistently urged that BOEM delay moving forward with wind energy development until a better understanding is made of the impacts to fish, wildlife, the marine environment, and cultural resources important to the tribe.”
He said he looks forward to collaborating on the best places to develop wind energy that minimize the impacts to the coast and tribes.
In an initial environment assessment, federal officials found that the initial process of surveying and planning for proposed wind projects off the Oregon Coast would have minor to moderate impacts on marine habitats, marine mammals and commercial fisheries.
The plan for wind energy comes at a time when both the state and federal government are looking for ways to switch away from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy to reduce harmful emissions. The current Climate Protection Program by Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality – which needs final approval – set a target of reducing emissions from fossil fuels by 50% by 2035 and by 90% by 2050.
But wind energy is only a small fraction of the state’s energy use.
Since President Joe Biden took office in 2021, his administration has approved the first 10 commercial offshore wind projects, enough for about 15 gigawatts of clean energy – enough to power more than 5 million households. The federal government has had five offshore wind lease auctions in that time, including off the coasts of New York, New Jersey, and California.
So let’s just dance merrily along as fossil fuel CO2 and methane emissions heat up the climate and make hurricanes, tornadoes and heat waves stronger and more frequent.
Sigh!
This is good news. Rushing forward for economic gain when there are important competing interests that require sober consideration is unwise, unsafe, and unhealthy. Good government recognizes this and insists on a thorough, wide ranging process to protect environmental, cultural, and economic systems for long term, wide ranging benefit. Rushing the process is rarely necessary (except for profiteers) and is often regrettable. As it turns out, offshore wind is many times as expensive as land-based wind and it’s far more environmentally harmful. Reality seems to be catching up to earlier exuberant promises as interest appears to be waning.
Has anyone or any agency or politician yet told us what the cost per KwH of such wind power will be? If not, why not? Wouldn’t a life time cost/benefit study be a necessity?
Do we have any estimate of what fraction of a degree in global warming would occur from such a wind project would make in 10, 20 or 50 years?
The national government would lease sea rights to private companies. Do we know how much the subsidies to these companies would be?
In other words, how do we know if this is a feel-good fashionable project or something that will provide lower electric bills to homeowners and businesses and whether it will have any significant impact on global climate?
Follow the science and follow the money.
Numbers, please.
Dan and Wallace make excellent well reasoned arguments here. This is what we need to counter those who are yelling that the end is near.