By GARRET JAROS/YachatsNews
There will be no aerial spraying of herbicides on 473-acres of clear-cut timberlands in the South Beaver Creek watershed northeast of Seal Rock.
The 86-year-old landowner, Sorn Nymark, walked into Lincoln County commissioners’ offices Monday to hand deliver a letter stating that his company — Ane Forests of Oregon – has heard the public outcry opposing spraying herbicides by helicopter and so will instead rely on crews using backpack sprayers.
“I am a strong advocate for climate and the environment, and I believe that climate change and global warming is the biggest threat to our grandchildren,” Nymark wrote. “I believe that the forest products sector provides a renewable green resource that is vital to our future.”
It is a requirement of the Oregon Forest Practices Act for timberland owners to reforest after a harvest, Nymark wrote, and science has validated that herbicides are an important tool in ensuring that reforested trees will grow successfully.
“Without them, weeds including many invasive species can easily take over and choke out trees,” he said in the letter.
Based on the obligation in the Forest Practices Act that planted trees are “free to grow” the company will move forward with herbicide application, he wrote.
“However, we can offer to do this via ground application rather than by helicopter,” the letter said. “This was large part decided based on concerns over protesters. It will cost us an additional $15,000 to $20,000 to switch to ground application.”
Nymark closed the letter by saying he was open to visiting with commissioners and discussing the issue further, but because of health and privacy concerns he did not want to participate in a public forum.
The company’s notification in early August to use a helicopter to spray the seven parcels in the watershed with weed-killing herbicides alarmed the Seal Rock Water District, many of its customers and residents in the valley.
The district serves 5,500 customers and has a one-year-old raw water intake immediately downstream of the areas to be sprayed. It was notified Aug. 8 that Ane Forests planned to spray by helicopter as early as Sept. 2.
District general manager Adam Denlinger sent an email shortly thereafter to the Oregon Department of Forestry, which manages private forestlands in the state, expressing concerns “that herbicides will be transported by aerosol drift, from the sprayed areas over nearby surface waters” and contaminate the district’s drinking water system.
When district customers and residents who live near the clearcuts learned of the plan to aerial spray a wellspring of opposition quickly formed with the goal of stopping all types of herbicide applications in the watershed.
On Aug. 30, Ane Forests submitted a new notification with the forestry department to use backpack spraying methods on its property, but that also left the door open to still apply herbicides by air. A company consultant said that decision would be left to Nymark.
The hand-delivered letter addressed to county commissioners was the first response from Nymark despite repeated efforts by Denlinger, commissioners and Rep. David Gomberg, D-Otis to meet with him.
While he has a home in Denmark, Nymark also clarified in his letter that he became the president of a Danish seed company in 1975, and it has a company in Halsey that is the largest breeder and exporter of grass seed in the United States.
“Over 30 years ago we invested in a home and property in Lincoln County which we have had since,” he wrote. “I am not an ‘absentee landlord’ as I have been involved as a contributor to this community for decades.”
County response
“Commissioners are grateful for Mr. Nymark’s flexibility and responsiveness to his neighbor’s sentiments, while Oregon law gives him the right to proceed with no adjustment to his original plan,” commissioners said in a statement Tuesday accompanying a copy of Nymark’s letter. “The commission believes this is the best possible outcome in this circumstance, considering existing regulations.”
Commissioner Casey Miller later told YachatsNews that after receiving the letter he emailed Nymark to say he was available to meet at Nymark’s convenience. Miller also complemented Denlinger’s efforts and shared his hopes moving forward.
“Adam (Denlinger) is doing a great job of making sure the bottom line is that drinking water is protected,” Miller said. “But where we go from here is really – my hope is that we all continue to have a community dialogue about forestry practices and in particular herbicide use.”
Water district response
“It is a relief to know that Mr. Nymark has foreclosed the option for now anyway for aerial application of herbicides,” Denlinger said Tuesday.
“We are relieved certainly to know that Mr. Nymark has taken this position on behalf of the community,” Denlinger said. “From what I understand and was identified in the letter is that he’s here, he’s listening to the community, he recognizes that there’s concern and he’s taking this action even though a compromise like this for him is going to be at a cost.”
Herbicides containing glyphosate have been used to prepare ground for seedlings in clearcuts on Oregon forestlands for decades and hundreds of herbicide applications have taken place in Lincoln County, according to the state’s notification records, which have been kept since 2016. There have been 26 completed aerial sprayings in the county since February 2022.
Over the last month the water district has learned that the application of herbicides has been going on for many years, Denlinger said, and that backpack spraying seems to be a safer method — although it still impacts the environment.
“It has less of an immediate impact on drinking water systems as long as the products are applied by the manufacturer’s label,” he said “And as long as the buffers are adhered to in the Oregon Forest Practices Act.”
There have been herbicides sprayed in the watershed in the past but chemicals have never been detected in the water samples collected quarterly by the district, Denlinger said. But that is no guarantee it could not happen in the future, he added.
“But for now, as long as these chemicals are used per the requirements of the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the EPA, when used responsibly, we have to believe it won’t impact the water system. It doesn’t mean the district is not concerned. Any chemicals used in the watershed is concerning.”
The water district plans to build relationships with forestland owners in Beaver Creek watershed so it can stay abreast of what is happening on the land in order to take proactive measures if needed.
Denlinger said he will continue to reach out to Nymark’s company to find out what amounts of chemicals are used and how close they are to tributaries that feed into the South Beaver Creek system and on to the main stem of Beaver Creek.
“And if we feel like there’s a need for additional sampling we will take those steps,” Denlinger said.
The 14-day public comment period that is required to proceed the beginning of any ground spray operations ends mid-day Wednesday so spraying could begin as early as Thursday.
The district will not be stepping up its monitoring beyond its normal quarterly water sampling along Beaver Creek barring any unexpected rain event.
“If we had a heavy rain event immediately following a spray-activity we would probably shut down and sample,” Denlinger said. “Just because with that we could see some runoff from that impact the water system. That potential exists but given the weather window that they have to work in I don’t see that likelihood right now.”
The district plans to monitor the situation closely, particularly by learning when Ane Forests plans to spray. But the company is under no legal obligation to notify residents or the district on its ground spray operations, and thus far Denligner’s requests to the company to keep him in the loop as a professional courtesy have gone unanswered.
“We understand that they have requested that the Oregon Department of Agriculture be onsite for the application, which is a good sign because we are in contact with ODA now so we could potentially receive the schedule information from (them) when it’s going to occur,” he said.
Denlinger said he is “extremely pleased” Nymark has considered the compromise to ground spray at additional costs to the company.
“He doesn’t have to do this and yet he’s doing it based out of concern, according to his letter, and we appreciate that,” Denlinger said. “I hope to be able to meet with him certainly sometime in the future if he is willing.”
- Garret Jaros is YachatsNews’ full-time reporter and can be reached at GJaros@YachatsNews.com
Laura Gill says
I’m not personally reassured by Adam Denlinger’s statements here about testing the district water. Also, not at all clear how we will know when Mr. Nymark’s people will be out spraying. Since notification of backpack spraying isn’t a requirement in the law. It won’t be simple to figure it out on our own, given the topography of the area. Lastly, the safety of these chemicals is still an open question. The EPA is fallible, they are just people like us. Science and medical research is evolving all the time. I personally believe that in 50 years it will be abundantly clear that the biologists and doctors were right, and we’ll wonder why we did this for so long. Cigarettes were considered safe for years too, mostly because people who knew better lied about the facts and it was allowed to happen. Just one example of many I can think of. Protect Beaver Creek Watershed, and fight for clean drinking water everywhere.
TiAnne Rios says
Well, let’s see, where to start. One time you could own slaves. One time women could not own land or have a credit card without signed consent from their husbands. One time cigarettes were sold to children. One time kids were allowed and expected to work-I believe it was child slavery. One time gay marriage wasn’t legal.
One time has come and gone. How could it be possible to legally spray chemicals meant to kill onto mountainsides when the person authorizing the spray and the government agencies keeping record of every spray know full well that these chemicals are slipping into the water supply for entire communities from run off or drift poisoning every living being along the way?
Recourse? Yes, we have recourse, when we can prove damage has been done. Oh, home owners have to pay out of pocket for baseline sampling. Then we have to live through insects dying, bees dying, our family pets dying, our gardens dying, people getting cancer. After which, we. the home owners, have to proe that it was a result of these awful chemicals- also a quite costly endeavor. Then we can follow up in legal recourse. That is exactly what is going on with Monsanto/Bayer and RoundUp paying out millions in settlements.
How many communities have to suffer this way before the laws are changed?
People over pesticides. Join us. https://www.stop-the-spray.com
John Parulis says
Spraying AquaNeat (50% glyphosate) is toxic whether it’s sprayed from a helicopter or by backpack spray. Please watch this video by MIT scientist Stephanie Seneff on the dangers of glyphosate. https://youtu.be/Z8xuyoKZv4s?si=ra74HZjTK46Dgu8d
What the timber industry calls competitive “unwanted” growth, may hold the key to healthy forests. There is new science out there on the benefits of plant diversity and their mycorrhizal networks in healthy agriculture and forest systems. Mr. Nymark needs to give that a chance on his timberland. Google Dr. Christine Jones to learn more.
Dannie Davis says
Love the Climate logic: spraying to kill plants and trees, to have more trees to clear cut down in the future, to spray the clean cut areas, again, again and again.
I understand trees are a renewal product, but eventually there is a problem with chronic spraying.
Holly Brandwen says
Spraying is not the answer to keeping plant growth down. There are other ways that need to be researched that can keep growth down for the trees to flourish, if logging is necessary, that do not use toxic herbicides. Native Americans utilized safe and effective ways to allow tree growth. It has been proven over and over glyphosate causes cancer. The cancer rate in this county is way over the norm. Why does this state allow killing off native growth as well as exposing us, our wildlife and farm animals to a toxic chemical mix so trees can be grown only to clear cut over and over so that people can make money. This does not help reduce global warming as older trees sequester carbon in the soil that young trees can not.
We are sickening and killing off both wildlife and plant life as well as causing serious illnesses to humans by spraying. The drinking water network is a delicate system that needs to be protected as it sustains human and animal life. If it becomes polluted with toxic chemicals it will devastating. We have already seen this in various areas of the U.S. Chemical runoff is a given with the amount of rain we experience and it will pollute not only the water but the land people raise food on. These chemical remain in the soil for years. This spraying must not be allowed to continue.
Dave Duncan says
The Oregon laws that permit anyone, Russian, Chinese, aliens, to buy up our state is unreal. Poisoning a water district water supply for thousands of our Lincoln County folk is insane. I am ashamed to call myself an Oregonian. Fight against this now or accept that the rich will control the poor. Same as it ever was. Same as it’s always been.