A Harney County judge decided Tuesday that the state cannot bar gun sales if a required background check is not completed within three days. (Connor Radnovich/Oregon Capital Chronicle)
By BEN BOTKIN/Oregon Capital Chronicle
A Harney County Circuit Court decision Tuesday will allow Oregonians to continue to buy firearms before completing a background check.
Harney County Judge Robert Raschio issued his decision Tuesday, preventing the state from enacting a background check requirement for firearm purchases. It is part of Measure 114, a law Oregon voters passed in November that is being litigated in Raschio’s court.
His decision is part of a wider temporary restraining order that prevents other parts of Measure 114 from going into effect while the lawsuit is pending. Measure 114 would enact a new permit system for people who want to purchase firearms that includes a required safety training course and certified instructors.
The decision maintains the status quo for Oregon’s firearm permit system, which allows gun dealers to sell firearms to buyers when Oregon State Police have not completed a background check within three days. Critics of the existing system call it the “Charleston loophole” because it allowed the perpetrator in a 2015 mass shooting in Charleston to obtain a firearm despite having a criminal record. In that shooting, nine people died in a church.
“Judge Raschio’s ruling puts the demands of the gun lobby ahead of public safety and the express will of Oregon voters,” Adam Smith, spokesperson for the Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety, said in a statement.
Measure 114 is intended to enhance gun safety in Oregon and make mass shootings more difficult. But opponents of the measure, including some rural sheriffs, argue that it infringes the constitutional right to bear arms and would require scarce law enforcement resources to run the permit system.
Since the law was passed, firearm purchases have soared, gun shop owners say, creating an even longer backlog of background check requests. Oregon State Police did not respond to a request Tuesday for details.
The judge wrote in his decision that the background checks and permit system in the new law are intertwined and the “court has made no final determination on the constitutionality of the program.”
The court will address the question of whether the background check requirements of the new law can remain in place only if it determines that the permit system is unconstitutional, Raschio wrote.
The Harney County lawsuit was filed against the state by Gun Owners of America, based in Virginia, and a related organization, the Gun Owners Foundation. Other plaintiffs include Joseph Arnold and Cliff Asmussen, two Harney County firearms owners. Gun Owners of America says on its website it has more than 2 million members and lobbies for firearms owners to exercise the “right to keep and bear arms without compromise.”
A spokesperson for the plaintiffs didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Other parts of the measure are on hold as the case proceeds. Those include a ban on the sale of high-capacity firearm magazines with more than 10 rounds and the permit system.
Kristina Edmunson, a spokesperson for the Oregon Department of Justice, said the state plans to appeal Tuesday’s ruling to the Oregon Supreme Court.
Backlog of applications
The passage of Measure 114 has led to a rush to purchase firearms amid fears the state will not have a system in place to process permit applications. In November, the Oregon State Police Firearms Instant Check System Program, which conducts the background checks, received 85,000 requests for background checks, court records show. That’s more than three times the 25,000 average requests each month the state received through October.
The state has a backlog of unfinished background checks. About 40% of requests can be completed within minutes, but the remaining 60% cannot be processed automatically because of potential matches to a criminal history or incomplete information, the Oregon Department of Justice said in a Dec. 22 memorandum filed in the case.
That memorandum said about 37,000 permit applications need staff review and state staff are reviewing background checks requested 34 days ago. In 2019 and earlier, there was no backlog. State police staff cleared all pending requests each day, the memo said. Oregon State Police didn’t respond Tuesday to a request for updated figures.
Since 2018, the state’s background check system has prevented more than 4,600 felons and more than 2,000 people on probation from illegally buying firearms, the memo said.
A federal court is handling a separate suit against Measure 114. In a ruling on that case earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut said Oregon can postpone the permit requirements after the state asked for a delay so it can set up a system. But Immergut ruled that other parts of the measure, including the ban on sales of high-capacity magazines with more than 10 rounds, can go into effect as scheduled on Dec. 8.
The Harney County judge’s order took precedence over the federal order, though. The Oregon Supreme Court declined to intervene at the request of Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum and the Oregon Department of Justice.
State officials have asked the federal court to give the state until March 7 to prepare a permit system. The Harney County judge has said he’ll have a hearing from both sides when the state’s permit system is ready.
- Oregon Capital Chronicle is a nonprofit Salem-based news service that focuses its reporting on Oregon state government, politics and policy.
Darla Kinsella says
We live in Oregon and my husband bought a pistol but there were 9,000 other permits that had to be background checked before him. This BM 114 is outrages and unconstitutional and it definitely won’t stop criminals from getting weapons. Why don’t they just lock up criminals instead of emptying prisons. There would be less violence and murders instead the the American people are paying the price for their mistakes. This measure is wrong, wrong, wrong and unconstitutional.
david says
Ballot Measure 114 is a bad law, period. It’s really odd how such a minute part rules the rest. Besides how can a measure like that be “barely” passed and then the state turns around and ask for more time to prepare a system?
Mike W says
Our current system does allow for the sales person (gun dealer) to sell the firearm to the buyer if the background check is not completed within three days. But, you know what, I don’t know of one dealer that has released a firearm, not once, to anyone until the check has ben completed. Do your homework.
Bb says
Capitol pawn will do it. In Albany.
TIME WILLIAM TELL says
Newport Pawn, also.
Elizabeth says
This is not entirely correct information.. the law reads Both state and federal laws provide that the dealer may deliver the handgun to the purchaser after a three business day period, if OSP does not provide notice that the purchaser has been approved or denied. OSP is giving an automated “delay” response on all transactions that are not instant approvals.. so you have a response from OSP and you will be violating the current law if you transfer the firearm before the response changes to an approval.
Nick says
This is, in fact, untrue. Delays come down as separate notification. OSP only copy/pastes into NICS the information on the 4473s, and if NICS issues a delay on a check, then the transfer needs to be delayed. Before such a time as there is an NICS response, it is in process, not delayed. OSP is not actually conducting any kind of background check, you just get to pay them $10 for the privilege of them pushing Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V.